GENERAL INFORMATION
| Service Type: | Pre-Shipment Inspection (PSI) | ||
| Trade Assurance order No.: | 276096702001025819 | Inspection Date: | Nov 7,2025 |
| Product Description: | Diesel Generator | Inspection Location: | Fu’ an, Fujian, China |
| Product Item/Style.: | N/A | Inspector Name(s): | Titan Hu |
| Order quantity: | 1 | Presented quantity: | 1 |
 Total Cartons: | NA | Selected Cartons: | NA |
 Product Pictures | |||
 |  | ||
| Product detail | Product detail | ||
| OVERALL INSPECTION CONCLUSION | PASS | ||||
| INSPECTION RESULT SUMMARY | PASSED | FAILED | PENDING | NOT APPLICABLE | |
| A. | INSPECTION CONDITION | x | |||
| B. | Conformity Check (Shipping Mark / Product / Labeling / Packing & Packaging / Color/Style) | x | |||
| C. | Workmanship / Appearance / Basic Function | x | |||
| D. | Trade Assurance Contract Quality Requirements Check | x | |||
| E. | On-site Tests | x | |||
REMARKS
| 1. | Were BV Anti-Counterfeiting (AC) stickers used for this inspection: | ||
| 2. | When inspector arrived, actual product was finished, but not packed, and factory claimed they would finish packing before shipment. | ||
| 3. | Actual product was same as the product picture provided by client, but it was different from the product picture on ALIBABA system, detail as below: | ||
| Actual | Product picture provided by client | On ALIBABA system | |
| | |||
| 4. | No approval sample or reference sample was available for this inspection. | ||
- INSPECTION CONDITION
| Result | Actual Finding / Comments |
| PASS | 1. When inspector arrived, actual product was finished, but not packed, and factory claimed they would finish packing before shipment. |
| Pictures | |
 | N/A |
 Finished not packed | |
- CONFORMITY CHECK
| Result | Actual Finding / Comments |
 PASS | 1. No failure | |
 Pictures | ||
 |  | |
 Product detail |  Product detail | |
 |  | |
| Product detail | Product detail | |
 |  |
  Product detail |   Product detail |
 |  |
 Product detail | Product detail |
| | |
| Product detail | Product detail |
 |  |
 Instruction manual |   Tool package |
| | |
| | |
| Product detail | Product detail |
- Workmanship / Appearance / Basic Function
| Inspection Standard: | ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 (formerly known as MIL-STD-105E) | ||||||
| Sampling Plan/Inspection Level | Single / Normal / S-3 | ||||||
| AQL- Defectives | Critical | Major | Minor | ||||
| Not Allowed | N/A | N/A | |||||
| Sample Size | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Defective Description | Critical | Major | Minor | ||||
| 1. | No critical defect was found | ||||||
| Total Found: | 0 | N/A | N/A | ||||
| Accept: | 0 | N/A | N/A | ||||
| Result: | PASSED | ||||||
| Remarks – Other defects observed but not counted in the AQL Result: NIL | |||||||
| Note: A Defective is defined as a unit of product that contains one or more defects. A Defect is defined as any non-conformance of the inspected unit of product with specified requirements. A single defect is taken into account per each defective unit, in every case the most serious defect exhibited by the individual sample being inspected regardless of the characteristic. The defects listed under “Remarks” above were also observed on the inspected samples but were not counted in the AQL result as they were less serious than other defects found on the same sample. | |||||||
- Trade Assurance Contract Quality Requirements Check
| Result | Actual Finding / Comments |
| NOT APPLICABLE | 1. Nil |
- ON-SITE TESTS
| INSPECTION PROPERTY | FINDING | |
| 1. | Product dimension check | PASS (220 x 95 x 150cm) |
| 2. | Product weight check | PASS 1064kg |
| 3. | Application Check | PASS |
| 4. | Earth Continuity Test | PASS |
| 5. | Hi-pot Test | PASS |
| Pictures | |
| Product dimension check | Product dimension check |
| Product dimension check | Product dimension check |
| Product dimension check | Product dimension check |
| Product weight check | Product weight check |
| Hi-pot test | Function test |
| Function test | Earth Continuity Test |
- DISCLAIMER
This document reflects our findings at the time and place of inspection, which was conducted by means of comparing reference product(s) and documents against samples that are randomly-picked in accordance with an agreed random statistical sampling standard from the lot(s) of finished products presented to our inspectors. This comparison was done in accordance with agreed inspection protocol and/or other agreement.
If certain methods and processes which vary or deviate from the standard and / or recommended practices of Bureau Veritas were adopted for the performance of this inspection at the request of the client, Bureau Veritas is not liable for the possible compromise of the recorded observations due to such variations or deviations.
This report / certificate does not discharge or release sellers / suppliers from their commercial, legal or contractual obligations with regard to quality / quantity of delivery nor does it prejudice the buyer’s right of claim toward sellers / suppliers for compensation for any defects (apparent or otherwise) not detected during our random inspection or occurring thereafter. Bureau Veritas does not accept any liability for the quality of products in this shipment that were not produced at the time of the inspection. Further, this report/certificate does not evidence shipment.
In the event that any equipment is provided by the client or factory to be used during the inspection for any measurement purposes, it is the sole responsibility of the client or factory to ensure that said equipment has been duly maintained and calibrated in accordance with the relevant standards. Bureau Veritas shall not be held responsible in any manner for the accuracy of the equipment or for any consequences in relation to the accuracy of the equipment.
Our services, including reports and certificates (if any), are subject to the Bureau Veritas Consumer Products General Conditions of Service, which have been made available to you and can be sent upon written request.
FINAL REPORT
This report contains all findings of the inspection. Summary information appears on the first page while detailed findings are reported in the subsequent pages. In order to fully understand the inspection results and avoid missing important information we strongly advise you to carefully read the entire report.
IMPORTANT NOTICE
The inspection scope is mainly based on specifications provided by our client, it does not include product design validation;
In case the Pre-Shipment Inspection (PSI) is requested but the prerequisite conditions are not met by the time of the inspection, the service will automatically be defaulted to the level of inspection, Initial Production Check (IPI) or During Production Check (DUPRO), which could be performed given the actual status of the subject product lot’s production and packing. In case the PSI cannot be performed, we strongly advise you to re-inspect your goods at a later stage, as some defects can appear in the remaining unfinished quantity, which has not been inspected by Bureau Veritas.
In the case the Workmanship check is failed, or very close to AQL limit, we strongly advise that you re-inspect your goods.
Please note repacking is done by the factory without Bureau Veritas inspector’s supervision.
Defects may appear after the inspection due to improper repacking, bad storage or transportation conditions and manufacturing process.